Holmlid's remark which states that it takes many weeks of laser stimulation before the Rydberg catalyst becomes active fits in with the tachyon theory of LENR fuel preparation.
According to tachyon theory, it takes the storage of 10^6 GeV to form a tachyon inside a black hole. If we have a trillion SPPs each needing a full charge of 1,000,000 GeV before each become active, that implies that a great deal of energy is needed to charge up that fuel to the tachyon stage. The various ways to inject energy into that fuel have differing power loading potential. Heat is the least effective method. Lasers seem to be somewhat more powerful but a few weeks to get the Holmlid fuel up to speed indicates to us that Laser power is marginal. Spark discharge and cavitation seem to be the most powerful methods of power injection. The short of it, the solitons that produce the LENR reaction hold a huge amount of energy. The situation is like a car with a battery the size of a building. It takes a long time to pump power into that energy storage device before it becomes active enough to produce high grade power with a high enough voltage. This is what Holmlid tells us. He says that it takes weeks of applying Laser power before the catalyst becomes active. Lasers and dipoles don’t talk well together. Lasers produce plain waves at a single frequency and dipoles don’t take kindly to that type of EMF. Dipole motion excited by light is where the power for LENR comes from. An electron and a photon must have the same energy level to join together to become a polariton. That marriage needs a common energy level. Only a meager number of dipoles finely tuned to the exact frequency of the laser will become entangled. If there is lots of bumps and nanocavities in the substrate that receives the light energy, then the Laser light will become decoherent and more digestible to the dipoles. Decoherent light( from an arc that R. Mills uses in the Suncell) is best so that dipoles at any stage of development will become polaritons. A scattered shot cloud from a shotgun is better at downing a clay pigeon than a 22 is. LENR replicators do not preprocess the fuel that they use and they don’t wait long enough for the LENR reaction to take hold. The Replicators do not build tachyons before they start their reactors. No one wants to invest the time and energy to properly prepare their LENR fuel. The various ways to inject energy into that fuel have differing power loading potential. Heat is the least effective method. Lasers seem to be somewhat more powerful but a few weeks to get the Holmlid fuel up to speed indicates to us that Laser power is marginal. Spark discharge and cavitation seem to be the most powerful method of power injection. According to the string theory of tachyon formation, once a tachyion has stabilized inside a black hole, it just sits there in a state of quiescence. When additional energy enters the tachyion, the excited tachyon expels it by transforming the incoming energy into a quark based subatomic particle. Tachyons form a condensate where they each get a fraction of the incoming energy. When enough energy has arrived and stored, all the tachions in the condensate each produce a subatomic particle. From what Holmlid tells us, it is a K meson. From the plots of K meson formation, all 10 billion k-mesons are produced at the same instant super-radiantly. We should expect that all the K-mesons would be the identically same subatomic particle: a minus K-meson. The negative energy partner particle would stay inside the tachyion and become a particle that travels backward it time. I don't know enough now to understand what that means. On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: > In answer to your original question Axil, could this be "why LENR produces > Neutral Kaons"? > > 1. Nickel 62 or Iron 58 acts as a source of long life K0 through some kind > of external stimulation to greater than 496 MeV, probably collective and > entangled stimulation, possibly from lasers, Phonons, magnetic stimulation > from SPP etc. (perhaps resonance of the Nucleus to particular quantum > states is required for this?) > > 2. The long life low Kinetic Energy K0 mesons which are neutral have a > half-life of 51 ns and contain a balanced combination of +/- strange and > down quarks then maybe get absorbed by other nuclei including UDD and > others. > > 3. The absorbed K0 in the nuclei interaction with other nucleons in the > Nuclei possible changing their type or leading to Nucleon disintegration > and generation +/- Kaons including the original s quarks from the K0? Can > this happen? Has this kind of behaviour ever been observed with K0 > interactions with Nuclie in other experiments? > > 4. Meson generation from the decay of +/- Kaons and 0 Kaons and further > decay chain through muons to electrons as described by Holmlid > > 5. Meson or Muon mediated fusion in Kaonic, Pionic or Muonic Atoms and > Nucleon disintegration giving enough energy to stimulate a source (phonon > or SPP) to allow further K0 production in Ni. > > The initial source to stimulate the original K0 would need to be accounted > for. > When we have the Laser could it stimulate this? > Without the laser would SPP perhaps present in the UDD or phonon > stimulation be able to stimulate a resonance to 496 MeV in the Fe58 or Ni62 > Nuclei? > > If neutral Kaons are generated from Ni62 and Ni58 how do we account for > LENR in Pd and Pt systems? Would we need Fe and Ni contaminants or would > some Kaons still be generated and tunnel in these nuclei? Or could they be > generated but interact with the nucleons within their parent nuclei, and > cause nucleon disintegration and generate +/- K and locally. > > Just some thoughts probably there are still holes in the idea. > > > > ------------------------------ > From: stephen_coo...@hotmail.com > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Subject: RE: [Vo]:Neutral K mesons violates CPT > Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:28:54 +0100 > > > Regarding my earlier Comments : > > " for a single K 0 to form this would imply a nucleus of heavier than > Nickel…." > > "*** If I understand correctly there are no sufficiently heavy elements > available in Holmlids experiment for Kaons to form this way? …" > > This is not strictly correct. > > Something new and potentially significant has come up: > > In fact Nickel 62 and Iron 56 and 58 have higher binding energy per > nucleon than average about 8.79 MeV per nucleon. (I was previously assuming > average natural mass numbers and 8 MeV per Nucleon) > > Ni 62 binding energy = 62 * 8.7945 = 545 MeV > Fe 58 binding energy = 58 * 8.7922 = 509 MeV > Fe 56 binding energy = 56 * 8.7903 = 492 MeV > > Ni 62 and Fe 58 would both therefore be sufficient for containing a K0 > Meson 496 MeV > Fe 56 on the other hand would just fall short. > > Fe is present in Holmlids experiment as part of the catalyst to form UDD. > > Ni is also present in Holmlids experiment as the target for the laser. > > This could be very important since the energy of the K0 is very close to > the maximum binding energy, it should be relatively easy to quantum tunnel > out of the nucleus within its half life. > > Could the Ni62 in the target (and maybe Fe58) be acting as a source of K0 > long mesons that then interact with other nuclei in particular the UDD. > > Note like neutrons K0 long have neutral charge so could easily be absorbed > by other nuclei, but also have a half-life of about 51 ns before decaying > to pions . > > These K0 could potentially interact with low energy impacts with any other > as well as the UDD, potentially leading nucleon changes or disintegration > in those nuclei. > > Perhaps the energy released in these K0 interaction and/or associate muon > or meson assisted fusion is sufficient to stimulate further K0 production > in other Ni62 or Fe58 Nuclei. > > > > ------------------------------ > From: stephen_coo...@hotmail.com > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Subject: RE: [Vo]:Neutral K mesons violates CPT > Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 17:56:52 +0100 > > Yup I agree with you Axil although I am no expert on these matters I also > don't know of anyway they could be generated from the protons. I will be > interested if someone has an explanation for that. > > Just to expand on the strange quark pair generation idea: > > This is why I was wondering that if sufficient energy is applied if a > strange anti strange quark pair can be manifested. If so quarks do not > exist in isolation so they would normally need to be contained in a meson. > Unlike Pion 0 which contain + and - up quarks or + and - down quarks I do > not see such a meson for just + and - Strange quarks. (Does any one know if > one exists)? > > There are a few other Mesons however might be applicable. These are the > eta meson, the eta prime meson, the short K 0 and the long K 0. All these > Mesons are neutral and are their own anti particle. All these Mesons > contain strange mixed up combination of + and - pairs of quarks the eta > contain Up, Down and Strange quarks, the short and long K0 contain Down and > Strange quarks. I'm not exactly what they mean in physical terms. The eta > and eta prime Mesons are heavier than the Kaons and have very short half > lives. The short kaon also has a short half life. The long Kaon however has > a longer half life of 51 ns. > > (The strange combinations of quarks in eta and K0 mesons can be found in > the Meson list in this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mesons) > > Since K0 short and Long are their own anti particle I wonder if they can > be generated individually at lower energy than required for + - Meson pairs > i.e 497 MeV for K0 long rather than 996 MeV for +/- Kaon pairs. > > I should say that if this process is to work either it would need to be > contained with in the nuclei. For particles the mass of Kaons this implies > quite heavy Nuclei otherwise the energy would exceed the nucleus binding > energy, for +/- K pairs it would imply nuclei heavier than Antimony are > required (perhaps Pt if available would full fill this) for a single K 0 to > form this would imply a nucleus of heavier than Nickel. I suppose one could > imagine a resonant or entangled process where the energy was raised and > distributed across several nuclei, thereby liberating Kaons from all the > nuclei at the same time. > > If heavy nucleons are available in Holmlids experiment this could lead to > a test of the idea by removing elements heavier than Nickel if we stopped > seeing Kaons (and maybe only see pions onwards), it could demonstrate that > maybe this process was in action. > > HOWEVER: > > *** If I understand correctly there are no sufficiently heavy elements > available in Holmlids experiment for Kaons to form this way? If I remember > right there are no elements heavier than Nickel listed? The catalyst I > think only contains Potassium, Iron and Oxygen. Is the is correct? If so it > implies another process must take place. *** > > I think in the current consensus this leaves effectively two > possibilities: > > 1. Concurrent Nucleon disintegration or annihilation with the production > of particles also including strange quarks, if so an explanation is needed > as to how down quarks can change to strange quarks for example. > > 2. Axil's SPP Analogue black hole Hadron evaporation. It will be amazing if > it can work that way, i wonder if there is a particular absolute proof way > to observe that , such as actually observing an form SPP and seeing Kaons > come directly as a result of it? I suppose we will have to wait for new > high tech equipment to see that. > > But maybe there is another mechanism too. (Hopefully not involving any > Gorillas ;) ) > > It is interesting that this test it may give us a window on CP violation > too > > > ------------------------------ > Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 11:42:22 -0400 > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Neutral K mesons violates CPT > From: janap...@gmail.com > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > > I don't understand how strange and antistrange quarks can come from > protons. There would need to be a quark reformatting process involved that > can turn matter into different matter and antimatter types instantly. It is > easier to accept that light energy from the laser is turned into matter and > antimatter, especially since the color of the light changes the nature of > the matter produced. Said in another way, different light makes different > matter. > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Stephen Cooke < > stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Could generation of +/- s quark pairs be the trigger for nucleon > disintegration. Could each pair with an up quark to form kaons and force > the disintegration of the nucleons from which the up quark comes? Each s > quark has a rest mass of 100MeV. I'm not sure if there is a meson > containing an s quark pair however. Unless it is in the form of K- long or > K- short also about 497 MeV that seem to contain a strange balanced mixture > of + and - down and strange quarks. I'm not knowledgable enough of a > nuclear physics to know if this is something to consider, but it seems > intersting. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 26 Oct 2015, at 08:03, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > K−, negatively charged (containing a strange quark and an up antiquark) > has mass 493.667±0.013 MeV and mean lifetime (1.2384±0.0024)×10−8 s. > K+ (antiparticle of above) positively charged (containing an up quark and > a strange antiquark) must (by CPT invariance) have mass and lifetime equal > to that of K−. > > The mass difference is 0.032±0.090 MeV, consistent with zero. The > difference in lifetime is (0.11±0.09)×10−8 s. What's weird is that two > different quarks types are produced out of nothing. You just don't find > strange quarks in ordinary matter. > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > in physical cosmology <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_cosmology>, > *baryogenesis* is the generic term for the hypothetical physical > processes that produced an asymmetry > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symmetry>(imbalance) between baryons > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baryon> and antibaryons produced in the very > early universe <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang>. The baryonic > matter <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter> that remains today, > following the baryonic-antibaryonic matter annihilation, makes up the > universe <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universe>. > > LENR could be responsible for the past and ongoing production of matter in > the universe in violation of CPT and that negative matter (antibaryons) is > being sent back in time. > > We see excess electrons pop into existence in LENR reactions. Could LENR > be the GOD reaction? In point of fact, Holmlid is producing electrons from > nothing in his experiment. Don't get excited, we are just talking here. > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > CPT THEOREM C(harge) -P(arity=reflection) -T(ime reversal) INVARIANCE is a > property of any quantum field theory in Flat space times which respects: > (i) Locality, (ii) Unitarity and (iii) Lorentz Symmetry. > > Holmlid is producing neutral K mesons. This particle demonstrates CP > violation, > > The discovery of CP violation in 1964 in the decays of neutral kaons > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaon> resulted in the Nobel Prize in > Physics <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Prize_in_Physics> in 1980 > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Prize_in_Physics#1980s> for its > discoverers James Cronin <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Cronin>and Val > Fitch <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Val_Fitch>. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CP_violation > > Who can say why LENR produces neutral K mesons? > > > > > > > >
