"An early experiment consisted of a huge tank of perchloroethylene buried deep in the earth (the solar neutrino telescope). The neutrinos detected were only about a third of those expected from the best models of the Sun's interior. Since we have accurate measurements of the amount of energy released by the Sun, a factor of three change in the rate of the main production reactions is hard to explain. More recent experiments at Super Kamiokande, the SAGE and GALLEX detectors, and the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory all get about half the expected neutrino flux, so the neutrino deficiency persists."
Cold fusion occurs everywhere in the son not just its core. The photosphere is a place where cold fusion can substantially increase the energy production in the sun to increase the temperature from 6,000K to 2,000,000 K. LENR can produce energy from nuclear reactions other than from the PP reaction where the neutrinos come from. So the assumption that neutrinos mark all energy produced in the sun's core is wrong. This solar neutrino flux is cited as the evidence for neutrino flavor change. Cold fusion in the sun could make that neutrino flavor change idea invalid. On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > It has become apparent to me now, that the sun is powered by a cold fusion > reaction based on metalized hydrogen. This compound is one of the special > compounds that support LENR. The structure of this material makes it > indestructible via monopole magnetism and forms the basis for the internal > heat production in the sun but also in the gas planets including jupiter, > saturn and uranus. The Safire simulation of the sun produces megawatt level > energy using this metalized hydrogen which generates helium 3 as a > byproduct. > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> a question- in your opinion, what are the similaries betwee the PdD wet >>> and the NiH dry a la Rossi-warm and hot systems and what justifies taking >>> them together scientifically Are they connected more by what we know or >>> about what we do not know about them? >>> >> >> I cite McKubre's law of the conservation of miracles. I think it is >> extremely unlikely there are two completely unrelated phenomena which >> produce heat, tritium and nuclear transmutations from metal hydrides. >> >> Pd-D produces helium in the same ratio as plasma fusion reactors do, so >> obviously it is a d-d reaction. I have no idea what the Ni-H p-p reaction >> produces, but I am sure that if people look they will find it. >> >> In any case, this reaction produces far more energy than any chemical >> reaction could, with no chemical changes. It clearly is not fission. So >> that leaves only fusion. To my knowledge, those are the only candidates >> known to science. I doubt it is zero point energy. >> >> - Jed >> >> >
