Horace Heffner wrote:

On Jan 9, 2006, at 11:00 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:


If so, then in order to produce an over-unity device, which is necessary if it's to produce usable power, they need to operate it above the thermodynamic breakevent point. Given the excess heat as a fraction of 1, that implies a temperatore of just

   T(high)/T(low) = 1 + 1/Excess_heat


While this applies to the Potapov vortex thing discussed earlier, and which is not at all related, I suspect it does not apply to Russ George's work. Since Les Case is involved it is reasonable they are looking at commercializing the D2 + catalyst stuff, which has no power input at all. In fact, the web site talks about solid state, which pretty much confirms that some form of the D2 catalysis stuff will be used.

Cool! That seems like the right direction to go. I confess I didn't see that on the web site -- it looked like the "solid state" talk all just had to do with any kind of fusion taking place within a metal lattice, which would include all CF experiments I'm familiar with. Certainly it includes wet-cell electrolysis-based CF as well as gas-loaded finely-divided Pd experiments.

In any case, I was, of course, reacting to Steve Krivit's post about the glow discharge device with my little thermo thing rather than commenting on Russ George's work in general.



Horace Heffner



Reply via email to