On Jan 9, 2006, at 2:46 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
But EarthTech never succeeds in reproducing anything, and it always
turns out they've done the experiment so differently from the
original that there was no hope of its working ... right? Or do I
have them mixed up with somebody?
Maybe this time it was different....
Well, it *is* true that Scott Little gained a reputation on vortex
for a psychic ability to suppress cold fusion. You know, a negative
telekinetic quantum observation thingy. 8^) OTOH, Scott's
excellence in calorimetry may be the reason for all the negative
results. If you listen to Dennis Cravens though, who has had stuff
on Scott's bench, Scott has a psychological tendency to shut things
down just when they are about ready to get cooking.
I've had much help over the years from Scott Little, and trust his
methods and integrity thoroughly. If I were to actually invest cash
in a new energy thing (other than one of my crackpot ideas of course)
I'd want to get his data on it. I wouldn't want to sell something
the customer could unconsciously psychically block from functioning.
Not for me to worry though. I'm out of experimenting money. My wife
and I are retired, and I think she's had about enough of this
crackpot experimenting stuff, and all my "ugly junk". 8^) And here
I am procrastinating on getting ready for income taxes.
In the dog house,
Horace Heffner
