> On Mar 21, 2016, at 23:14, "Russ George" <russ.geo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The Lugano issue is the mono-isotopic signature in Ni… no pure isotope Ni is > available (99%-93% pure isotopes of Ni are available). The instrumentation is > capable of seeing into the second decimal place in % so where are the other > isotopes of Ni even as a small signature if the Lugano report which is either > a gross error or worse – incompetence, mis-direction
Misdirection or incompetence by two third-party labs who carried out the isotope assays? See Appendixes 3 and 4. Eric
