It seems to me there is only one issue which will determine the significance of 
this test, was IH controlling it and will they be reporting the results.  If 
so, all the speculation about Rossi being a fraud is nonsense and a figment of 
imagination.

 

If IH wasn’t’ involved and didn’t control the test and won’t support the 
results then the speculation is correct and not nonsense.

 

The ability to test a device over a year under the circumstances would have to 
be child’s play.  

 

So we have to wait to see if IH speaks to the test.

 

Ransom

 

From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 9:33 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Rossi and IH have received the ERV Report

 

From: Alain Sepeda

There is no absolute third party as interest and incentive connect…[snip]… The 
only conspiracy is a consensus… This is not a conspiracy but a groupthink, 
mutual assured delusion as Benabou name it.

Daniel Rocha wrote:

Rossi's definition of 3rd party is somewhat exotic. 

Gentlemen,

I am overjoyed to see that a few others who have studied this ongoing 
tragi-comedy are stepping up to the soap-box to label it as a staged 
rabble-rousing embarrassment … being closer to entertainment than to science. 

It is reminiscent of a recreation of “Waiting for Godot” with Rossi’s hapless 
fan-club believing that an existential magician will appear to save the masses 
from the devil’s excrement -- in the face of doubt from the dreaded 
intelligentsia, their so-called patho-skeptics. 

MAD or “mutually assured delusion” is a better descriptor for those who do not 
want to break it down into the teachable moment that it will morph into – a few 
days after the new wears off the so called “third party report” - and the stink 
rises.

My sincere hope is that there is a grain of truth in the otherwise phony 
results, and that the year-long effort was not a complete work of fiction. 
However, that stance is an extreme minority view: that Rossi can be both 
con-artist-deluxe and misunderstood genius inventor, at the same time. 

He is a one-of-a-kind, no matter what the bottom line happens to be. Six years 
ago, before his almost complete disregard for the truth was exposed, we labeled 
Rossi as the “most interesting man in the world” and that descriptor has a 
little more mileage on it, but my guess is that the house of cards is about to 
implode, and Rossi’s fan-boys will go back to waiting for Godot.

Reply via email to