Here is the link to the papers: https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/11135976/Rossi_et_al_v_Darden_et_al
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Lennart Thornros <lenn...@thornros.com> wrote: > > I disagree Jed. >> I think you have received a message as good as you could expect. COP is 6. >> > > You mean in the 2012 Penon report. Right? Where does it say the COP is 6? > It says output was 2.5 ~ 3.7 kW, and input was 3.6 kW. > > I do not think much of the methodology. I recommend calibrations and the > use of thermocouple to augment the IR camera. > > I admit I have not looked as closely as I did to the Levi reports, but I > am not impressed. I have no idea how Penon measured the output from the 1 > MW reactor, but he does not seem good at calorimetry. > > > >> The quality of the person doing the report and his qualifications you can >> judge when you have all information. Way too early to put up new obstacles. >> > > If you are talking about the 2012 report we have had plenty of time and > information. I am not sure what you refer to. > > - Jed > > > -- Patrick www.tRacePerfect.com The daily puzzle everyone can finish but not everyone can perfect! The quickest puzzle ever!
