89 million dollars is a lot of money. I think there will be a settlement within three months. I do not think we need to find out who is the bad boy. I think they all are in a league they have not played before. My reasoning for believing in a settlement is that they destroy the lead to the market if they drag this out.
Best Regards , Lennart Thornros [email protected] +1 916 436 1899 Whatever you vividly imagine, ardently desire, sincerely believe and enthusiastically act upon, must inevitably come to pass. (PJM) On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Lennart Thornros <[email protected]> wrote: > Jed, > I am amazed. You just say things. no support as far as I can see. > You said in black I think in red. > While I have not disqualified these measurements, I have some doubts about > them because: > > 1. Based on his previous work, Penon is not qualified to do calorimetry. I > have no clue about how well you know this guys qualifications except you > read a report you think was flawed. If the COP was 50, then I (and I am not > good at calorimetry) could give the answer that at least COP6 was reached. > > 2. Penon is not independent of Rossi. How do you know that? How could IH > use a guy they suspect is in Rossi's pocket. You underestimate the players. > > 3. He is not licensed in Florida to do this kind of measurement. Sorry > but license is just an issue of passing a simple exam and pay the fees. I > know there is probably some experience required but that can always be > fixed - believe me.BTW if he is licensed anywhere would that make a > difference. > > 4. I. H. said they disagree with the result. They know more about > calorimetry than Penon does, so I am inclined to believe them. Now you > are way out of line. IH does not know anything. My guess is that Darden and > I are equal when it comes to calorimetry. Other people in IH are not in the > picture and then calorimetry is not the only way to get things secured. > > I will have to wait to see the report. I agree you are way too early. My > guess is that it will never be published, so we will never know who is > right. I would have agreed with you a couple of days ago. Now we might > see a lawsuit and then this report will be fully disclosed. It will take a > couple of years but . . . > > I do not know if you doubt that we are approaching a new technology that > can have positive impact on many areas of life or ??? > > Best Regards , > Lennart Thornros > > > [email protected] > +1 916 436 1899 > > Whatever you vividly imagine, ardently desire, sincerely believe and > enthusiastically act upon, must inevitably come to pass. (PJM) > > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Lennart Thornros <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> The info about COP I took from Rossi's pressrelease: >>> According to the independent third party report, over the 352 day test >>> period, the E-Cat consistently generated energy at a rate in excess of six >>> (6) times the amount of energy consumed by the plant, often generating >>> energy exceeding fifty (50) times the amount of energy consumed during the >>> same period. >>> >> >> >> >>> It is just mind boggling to me that you disqualify the measurements and >>> the methods before you have any details. >>> >> >> I have not disqualified these measurements. I have not seen them. I was >> talking about Penon's previous report. It was lousy. >> >> While I have not disqualified these measurements, I have some doubts >> about them because: >> >> 1. Based on his previous work, Penon is not qualified to do calorimetry. >> >> 2. Penon is not independent of Rossi. >> >> 3. He is not licensed in Florida to do this kind of measurement. >> >> 4. I. H. said they disagree with the result. They know more about >> calorimetry than Penon does, so I am inclined to believe them. >> >> I will have to wait to see the report. My guess is that it will never be >> published, so we will never know who is right. >> >> >> >>> See the positive and I think Rossi is correct saying; "the world is one >>> step closer to the realization of a commercially available new, clean and >>> efficient energy source." >>> >> >> I doubt it. >> >> - Jed >> >> >
