Frank has posted one of the documents here: http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/04/06/complaint-of-andrea-rossi-and-leonardo-corp-court-document-cop-substantially-greater-than-fifty-50-during-test/
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Lennart Thornros <[email protected]> wrote: > Jed, > The info about COP I took from Rossi's pressrelease: > According to the independent third party report, over the 352 day test > period, the E-Cat consistently generated energy at a rate in excess of six > (6) times the amount of energy consumed by the plant, often generating > energy exceeding fifty (50) times the amount of energy consumed during the > same period. According to Andrea Rossi, Leonardo Corporation considers > the results of the third party test to be "an overwhelming success" and > that > It is just mind boggling to me that you disqualify the measurements and > the methods before you have any details. > Just let things play out. It has been in pipeline for over 25 years, there > is result from serious tests that confirm that it is possible. I agree > there are several steps to go: engineering, theory etc.. See the positive > and I think Rossi is correct saying; "the world is one step closer to the > realization of a commercially available new, clean and efficient energy > source." > > > Best Regards , > Lennart Thornros > > > [email protected] > +1 916 436 1899 > > Whatever you vividly imagine, ardently desire, sincerely believe and > enthusiastically act upon, must inevitably come to pass. (PJM) > > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Lennart Thornros <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I disagree Jed. >>> I think you have received a message as good as you could expect. COP is >>> 6. >>> >> >> You mean in the 2012 Penon report. Right? Where does it say the COP is 6? >> It says output was 2.5 ~ 3.7 kW, and input was 3.6 kW. >> >> I do not think much of the methodology. I recommend calibrations and the >> use of thermocouple to augment the IR camera. >> >> I admit I have not looked as closely as I did to the Levi reports, but I >> am not impressed. I have no idea how Penon measured the output from the 1 >> MW reactor, but he does not seem good at calorimetry. >> >> >> >>> The quality of the person doing the report and his qualifications you >>> can judge when you have all information. Way too early to put up new >>> obstacles. >>> >> >> If you are talking about the 2012 report we have had plenty of time and >> information. I am not sure what you refer to. >> >> - Jed >> >> >> > -- Patrick www.tRacePerfect.com The daily puzzle everyone can finish but not everyone can perfect! The quickest puzzle ever!
