Lennart Thornros <[email protected]> wrote:
> The info about COP I took from Rossi's pressrelease: > According to the independent third party report, over the 352 day test > period, the E-Cat consistently generated energy at a rate in excess of six > (6) times the amount of energy consumed by the plant, often generating > energy exceeding fifty (50) times the amount of energy consumed during the > same period. > > It is just mind boggling to me that you disqualify the measurements and > the methods before you have any details. > I have not disqualified these measurements. I have not seen them. I was talking about Penon's previous report. It was lousy. While I have not disqualified these measurements, I have some doubts about them because: 1. Based on his previous work, Penon is not qualified to do calorimetry. 2. Penon is not independent of Rossi. 3. He is not licensed in Florida to do this kind of measurement. 4. I. H. said they disagree with the result. They know more about calorimetry than Penon does, so I am inclined to believe them. I will have to wait to see the report. My guess is that it will never be published, so we will never know who is right. > See the positive and I think Rossi is correct saying; "the world is one > step closer to the realization of a commercially available new, clean and > efficient energy source." > I doubt it. - Jed
