I am actually hopeful. 50x is pretty high. It was installed in a customer site. That's some crazy attempt at fraud.
Maybe 71 is stated wrong, and it only surged to 50x. But if not, 50x over the lifetime.. that's impressive an Rossi should get his due. On Wednesday, April 6, 2016, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Russ George <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > > That is a very straight legal case Rossi reveals that points to the >> failure of IH to honor its contract. Rossi is clearly going to win this >> unless IH pays up the $89 million. >> > > Only if: 1. Rossi has not misrepresented the contracts; and 2. Penon's > report has merit. I know nothing about 1. Regarding 2, I have not seen the > report, but I have doubts about Penon's abilities. Rossi's previous tests, > including the 1 MW test in Italy, were terrible. Very sloppy. Full of holes > that could easily have been fixed. So I do not trust his technical > judgement. > > As I said here before, if you are a licensed HVAC engineer and you do > things by the book, you will get the right answer. But Penon is not > licensed and he seems incompetent. Rossi is clearly incompetent, in ways > that I and many others such as the people from NASA pointed out. Unless and > until we see this report we cannot judge, but I would not rule out a > mistake or even fraud. > > It is impossible to judge the technical merits of this argument without a > careful examination of the Penon report. You might need to see more data > than that. > > - Jed > >
