Jack,
Thank you for proving my  point  (Skeptics will not believe any test)
You have no idea what tests were run on the 1 MW plant by the EVR but you have already dismissed it sight unseen.

"Brad,

I concur. Nobody talking here is a pseudo-skeptic. Every one of us who is skeptical here has devoted a large amount of time (and money for some of us) to reading, analyzing, thinking, and even directly conducting many experiments. I have wanted the E-cat to work as much as anyone, and understand how it is hard to give up that hope when you have invested so much in seeing it through to a positive outcome. But we can't let that cognitive dissonance cause us to continue down a path of waste when there may be other more fruitful avenues. Eventually, a person must say, "enough is enough" and realize a dream is just a dream and open our eyes to look around for something real and worth investing effort in. It is painful to do, but better than continuing down that path.

Jack


On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 3:36 PM Brad Lowe <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Wait for another inconclusive report written by a dunce or a paid
stooge? Rossi has wasted many man-years of our collective time. I am
done waiting.

And don't call me a pseudo-skeptic. We all would have been happy with
any report where a gas generator ran the E-cat which heated a body of
water. With a 1MW output, he could run that in a day to prove his
claim and win back his millions. Rossi doesn't have anything of
commercial value. Time to admit Rossi's grandfatherly demeanor and
confident lies fooled me and many others.

- Brad


On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 1:05 PM, a.ashfield <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Brad Lowe wrote. "Goat-guy made a great comment on next big future where he > makes a very good guess as to how Rossi is faking the results of the tests."
>
> Wait and see what the ERV report shows.
>
> I doesn't mater what the test it will not be enough to persuade pseudo
> skeptics. As Rossi said long ago, the only proof will be sales of working
> reactors."
>.

Reply via email to