Craig Haynie <[email protected]> wrote: Rossi also wants his intellectual property back. Last year, IH filed a > patent on Rossi's technology. >
I.H. said his device does not work, therefore the intellectual property is worthless. Plus they have not paid him the $89 million. So I.H. no reason to keep it, and no standing to keep it (since they have not paid). Even if they said they want it, I expect any judge would rule they have to give it back. - Jed
