a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thank you for proving my point (Skeptics will not believe any test) > You have no idea what tests were run on the 1 MW plant by the EVR but you > have already dismissed it sight unseen. > But not without reason. Those of us who are familiar with the people and the work of I.H. find them more credible than Rossi. When Rossi says the test was positive, but I.H. says it was not, then sight unseen I will assume I.H. is right. I would say the same if McKubre had examined the results and it was his word against Rossi's. Some people have more credibility than others. This is not a scientific method of judging a result, but it is valid. - Jed
