Rossi would not has gone to court if the ERV was not supportive of his case.
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 9:55 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Craig Haynie <[email protected]> wrote: > > Rossi also wants his intellectual property back. Last year, IH filed a >> patent on Rossi's technology. >> > > I.H. said his device does not work, therefore the intellectual property is > worthless. Plus they have not paid him the $89 million. So I.H. no reason > to keep it, and no standing to keep it (since they have not paid). Even if > they said they want it, I expect any judge would rule they have to give it > back. > > - Jed > >
