Patent law requires that Rossi be identified as inventor even if he did not know that the patent was filed. I.H. has the right to file patents in Rossi;s name and claim co assignment as inventor.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Roarty, Francis X < [email protected]> wrote: > Perhaps Rossi NEEDS to take it back in court so any patent applications > made by IH that are based on Rossi materials and IP are stripped and > assigned to Rossi. He certainly wants the money most but I think he is also > very concerned about the new IH patents and how much IP that IH has shared > with competitors. The liability could be enormous compared to the 89M. > > Fran > > > > *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Sunday, April 10, 2016 9:59 PM > *To:* vortex-l <[email protected]> > *Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Next Big Future - goes out on a limb > > > > Rossi would not has gone to court if the ERV was not supportive of his > case. > > > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 9:55 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Craig Haynie <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Rossi also wants his intellectual property back. Last year, IH filed a > patent on Rossi's technology. > > > > I.H. said his device does not work, therefore the intellectual property is > worthless. Plus they have not paid him the $89 million. So I.H. no reason > to keep it, and no standing to keep it (since they have not paid). Even if > they said they want it, I expect any judge would rule they have to give it > back. > > > > - Jed > > > > >
