What really upsets me is that folks are defending Rossi here versus Thomas Darden, a successful leader who has worked hard to invest and advance environmental technology. Also someone who cut cheques of 11M plus to Andrea Rossi, by all public reports, a convicted fraudster who spent time in Jail.
That's right, Darden gave real investor money to an ex-con. And yet people are defending Rossi, here? Come on!! I really hope Rossi has something, but I think everyone would be better served if his Fans would grasp reality and speak to Rossi with a unified voice that it is now time for him to either go-away, shut down his blog, and STFU until he has something Real that he can share publically. On Monday, April 11, 2016, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > The study of LENR now requires a study of the law. Reading how the 89M is > paid has nothing to do with IP. Final payment is strictly based on a > positive ERV report. IMHO, I.H. cannot holdback payment because they are > not satisfied with the distribution of IP. > > Any IP issues are red herrings with regards to the final payment based on > the letter of the licence agreement. > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 8:23 PM, Blaze Spinnaker <blazespinna...@gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','blazespinna...@gmail.com');>> wrote: > >> No, Thomas Darden is a committed environmentalist who's been working on >> these things for his whole life. His whole network of friends are >> supportive of environmental causes. This sort of thinking is what makes >> vortex a bit scary at times. >> >> The reality is that patents / etc are all meaningless. Rossi just has >> to publish schematics for his device. He's old and as far as I know >> doesn't have children. Nothing in the world could stop him if he had >> anything real. >> >> It's pretty simple though. The guy has a lose relationship with the >> truth and a history of causing cluster****s, and this is yet another. >> >> >> On Monday, April 11, 2016, Che <comandantegri...@gmail.com >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','comandantegri...@gmail.com');>> wrote: >> >>> >>> This thought must have occurred to others -- even when things were going >>> swimmingly... but I don't see mention of it bobbing to the surface here. >>> >>> Q: Could this entire undertaking with these present U.S. venture >>> capitalists have been a set-up job all along -- *intended* to embroil and >>> sink Rossi from the start: with the ultimate goal of sinking the entire >>> LENR field if possible; but specifically aimed at doing its desired damage >>> through (at the very least) tying the E-Cat up in the U.S. courts for >>> years... and thus sidelining and ruining the legitimately-aggrieved parties >>> (Rossi & Co.)..? >>> >>> Who would have an interest in doing just that..? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >
