How does "and pay Rossi what is agreed upon." mean "this troll here defending a vulture capitalist outfit ". Something is wrong with my writing or your reading.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 12:41 AM, Che <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 9:10 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thomas Darden shall not avoid the requirements of the Licence Agreement >> and pay Rossi what is agreed upon. The positive ERV is the ONLY requirement >> for payment defined in the LA. Even the Pope must follow the law. Being >> a sainted person does not give that person the right to ignore >> a legally binding agreement. >> > > > Why the blazes is this troll here defending a vulture capitalist outfit > which is welching on a contract which has quite apparently NOT been voided > on the Rossi side..? I read the entire legal complaint. This *all* hinges > on the outcome of the long-term validation process. My understanding is > that this *was* a success. > > Who's lying here... and why? > > >
