Thomas Darden shall not avoid the requirements of the Licence Agreement and pay Rossi what is agreed upon. The positive ERV is the ONLY requirement for payment defined in the LA. Even the Pope must follow the law. Being a sainted person does not give that person the right to ignore a legally binding agreement.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected]> wrote: > What really upsets me is that folks are defending Rossi here versus > Thomas Darden, a successful leader who has worked hard to invest and > advance environmental technology. Also someone who cut cheques of 11M > plus to Andrea Rossi, by all public reports, a convicted fraudster who > spent time in Jail. > > That's right, Darden gave real investor money to an ex-con. > > And yet people are defending Rossi, here? Come on!! > > I really hope Rossi has something, but I think everyone would be better > served if his Fans would grasp reality and speak to Rossi with a unified > voice that it is now time for him to either go-away, shut down his blog, > and STFU until he has something Real that he can share publically. > > On Monday, April 11, 2016, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The study of LENR now requires a study of the law. Reading how the 89M is >> paid has nothing to do with IP. Final payment is strictly based on a >> positive ERV report. IMHO, I.H. cannot holdback payment because they are >> not satisfied with the distribution of IP. >> >> Any IP issues are red herrings with regards to the final payment based on >> the letter of the licence agreement. >> >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 8:23 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> No, Thomas Darden is a committed environmentalist who's been working on >>> these things for his whole life. His whole network of friends are >>> supportive of environmental causes. This sort of thinking is what makes >>> vortex a bit scary at times. >>> >>> The reality is that patents / etc are all meaningless. Rossi just has >>> to publish schematics for his device. He's old and as far as I know >>> doesn't have children. Nothing in the world could stop him if he had >>> anything real. >>> >>> It's pretty simple though. The guy has a lose relationship with the >>> truth and a history of causing cluster****s, and this is yet another. >>> >>> >>> On Monday, April 11, 2016, Che <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> This thought must have occurred to others -- even when things were >>>> going swimmingly... but I don't see mention of it bobbing to the surface >>>> here. >>>> >>>> Q: Could this entire undertaking with these present U.S. venture >>>> capitalists have been a set-up job all along -- *intended* to embroil and >>>> sink Rossi from the start: with the ultimate goal of sinking the entire >>>> LENR field if possible; but specifically aimed at doing its desired damage >>>> through (at the very least) tying the E-Cat up in the U.S. courts for >>>> years... and thus sidelining and ruining the legitimately-aggrieved parties >>>> (Rossi & Co.)..? >>>> >>>> Who would have an interest in doing just that..? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>
