Lennart Thornros <[email protected]> wrote: Jed - nobody but Rossi has a claim with IH. >
Do you mean only Rossi is working with I.H? That is incorrect. I know several researchers funded by them. I think you need to tell what you know and how that makes you so sure about > the situation. > I told you already! I have met with the people at I.H. They told me. I believe them, because I find them far more credible than Rossi. So does everyone else I know who has met with them. That's all there is to it. > I still do not agree with the way you have thrown Rossi under the bus. > Rossi threw himself under the bus when he rejected the Navy, NASA and others. If you don't believe what I said about that, I invite you to contact the people at the Navy and NASA. > Not long ago you sounded different. > Nope. Not since I heard about Rossi almost blowing up the people from NASA. I hoped earlier that I.H. and Rossi had resolved their differences, and that he would present a reasonable final report. I agreed to present a paper at Lewan's seminar. That seminar was only going to happen if Rossi presented a good report. So obviously I hoped that would happen. But when I.H. sent me the March 10 press release, I saw it had not happened. > You have other info you need to present it or your say is just BS, > Of course I have other info. I said I do. Obviously I cannot present it. If you want to know more, I suggest you visit I.H. - Jed
