I wrote:
> can you reveal why? >> > > Sorry, no I cannot describe details. I will say that sources outside of > I.H. confirmed that the calorimetry is badly done. > That is a little unclear. I mean: I cannot describe the details, but the gist of it is, I.H. thinks that Rossi's calorimetry is badly done and his conclusions are invalid. Experts from outside of I.H. have examined the calorimetry and they told me they agree with I.H. As I said before, this dispute is about calorimetry and *nothing else*. If I.H. thought there is excess heat, they would happy to pay the $89 million. If they do not pay, they get no IP and they write off the $11 million. Why would they do that if they think the machine works?!? - Jed
