Show me and the all Vortex and we might just agree. Just sitting there telling a bunch of smart people how it is makes no sense. Show it. On May 20, 2016 14:34, "Jed Rothwell" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Lennart Thornros <[email protected]> wrote: > > Jed, just one reason one proof is more reliable than another. >> Because you believe? >> > No, because the data shows it. > > >> If IH is in control they would come free . . . >> > I.H. is not in control. As Rossi said in the Lewan interview, the I.H. > expert insisted he must see the customer machinery, but Rossi refused. > > My data comes from Rossi. His instruments. Not from I.H. The numbers I > have are the same as the ones quoted by Rossi in the Lewan interview. What > he does not say is that he screwed up the analysis, the configuration and > choice of instruments, and that every expert who has looked at the data > concluded there is no excess heat. Plus every non-expert such as me. > > - Jed > >
