On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Lennart Thornros <[email protected]> wrote:
IH has not played there hand very wisely, which surprise me. What are they > hiding? If you have had a chance to read IH's reply to Rossi's complaint, which of the original claims to you believe to survive the reply? Consider that this is just one step in a large series of actions that IH can potentially take. Whatever one else can conclude from IH's reply, one gets a sense that Rossi's lawyer is inexperienced. Rossi has a difficult situation regardless of what he can show next. At > least do not judge before you have facts. I mean facts supported of reality > if you want any acknowledgement of your scientific claims. The personal > attacks are way out of line. I suspect that Rossi has seriously miscalculated. Eric
