I gather IH's response is more of a legal formality. Trying to dismiss the case so they can get it ruled on by a judge rather than a jury. My reading of the statement puts IH in a rather poor light. It's as if they set out to delay the 1 MW plant test on purpose because they just wanted the IP.

Rumor has it this is just part one of a of a series of responses that will drag things out for years. I recall speculating years ago the the lousy patent situation would end up giving the lawyers more money than the inventors.

If Rossi is successful with the QuarkX test i think it will change the game. Particularly if he can start selling them later this year. Seems to me the tenor of the blog posts have changed and there is a swing back in favor of Rossi.

Reply via email to