a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote: > Your comment “I do not think Rossi is mad. I think he is in it for the > money” is an ad hominem that serves no useful purpose. > That is my informed opinion. Furthermore, if you say that, I say your ad hominem attacks against I.H. serve no useful purpose. At least I have evidence for my claims. You have nothing.
If Rossi were in it for the money he could have retired long ago. He is > now 66. > Once a thief, always a thief. > You go on again about Rossi not allowing IH into the customer’s building > and even pad locking it. IH agreed not to enter that building in writing > . . . . > I doubt they did, but if they did, they changed their minds. For good reason. The I.H. expert insisted he must see the facility. Any sane person evaluating this system would demand that, because it was impossible to measure the heat with the instruments in Rossi's facility. and that the customer had a proprietary process is at least as plausible as > that it was fraud. > That is an example of delusional thinking brought about by Rossi's reality distortion field. Please stop for a moment and THINK about what you just said. Think! I.H. experts could examine the exhaust system without looking closely at the customer's equipment. In fact, the customer does not exist. It is a sham corporation formed by Rossi's lawyer which has reported no business and no income. There is no equipment in the building. There is no noise, and no one has been seen going in or out. You cannot run industrial equipment that consumes 1 MW of process heat without people to operate it, or noise, and without reporting some sort of business activity to the state of Florida, not to mention state industrial safety inspectors. What I have read was that IH were about to remove Rossi’s 1MW plant and > that was why Rossi locked his part of the building. > It was locked the whole year. > IH had no right to enter that without the customer’s permission. > The "customer" is owned by Rossi. It is a sham. We have visited measuring the performance of a black box several times > already. > You cannot do that with the instruments in Rossi's portion of the building. As noted by I.H. they are "unsuitable measuring devices." Any knowledgeable person will see that a glance. As I said, anyone looking at the configuration would say, "is this supposed to be a joke?" It is as bad as the worst of Rossi's previous demonstrations. Your statement about having to know how the generated heat is dissipated is > not true. > It is the only possible way to estimate the heat production. > You imply that there is nothing wrong with you having secret information > but it is wrong when Rossi does. > It is wrong when Rossi withholds vital information from I.H. experts in violation of his agreements. It is okay to withhold it from the general public. I see you later repeated your claim. “Rossi is a fraud. He has nothing. > His machine does not work” The problem is you have NOT presented proof > for this. > I cannot present it now, but Rossi's locking the door is all the proof you need. As I said, there is no plausible reason for doing that other than fraud. There is other, more direct evidence of fraud. - Jed
