Yeah, and the "experts" said that Pons & Fleischmann had nothing too -
and they were wrong
On 8/8/2016 6:38 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
On 08/08/2016 06:25 PM, Che wrote:
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence <[email protected]>
wrote:
The group got Rossi'd a couple years back and we're still
gradually digging out from under.
Ditto the entire LENR world, I'm afraid.
I think the issue still remains: *did* Rossi turn Nickel into copper
-- and produce excess energy -- *at all*. Or not.
The 'con' part is the _least_ part, AFAIC. Maybe his ambition made
him stoopid. What is the REAL physics going on here, regardless..??
There almost certainly isn't any interesting physics here. He's been
proved to lie about his experiments and falsify his data. Consequently
the only reason to believe there is anything interesting going on
inside the ecat is blind faith, which has no place here.
IOW, the only reason for thinking there might be something magical
going on here is "Rossi said so" and that's worthless.
If you want to spend time digging into all his reported results, and
try to figure out exactly how each one was faked, and who must have
colluded with him and who was just a patsy and what bits of misleading
data he had to provide to fool various people, you can certainly do
so, but the world is so chock-full of frauds that it hardly seems
worth the effort.
I'm not sympathetic to people who commit fraud. I've had far too much
experience with the "alternative medicine" field, which is very
similar to the "free energy" field, and it has used up my patience for
such slime.
