Russ George <[email protected]> wrote:

Just show your source and the documented evidence/data, you ask for no less
> of Rossi et al.
>

I was asked not to reveal this up until now. You can now learn nearly
everything I know by reading the documents uploaded by I.H. in the trial
(especially Exhibit 5), and Rossi's interview with Lewan. See:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6qvuFUMAp9HMEQyeHZlX256U1E/view

https://animpossibleinvention.com/2016/05/16/rossi-makes-offer-on-swedish-factory-building-plus-more-updates/

For convenience, let me again summarize what the sample data I have seen
shows:

Flow 36,000 kg/day exactly. Pressure 0.0 bar exactly. Fluid temperature
102.8°C (varying by a few degrees).

That's all there is to it. If you would like to make your own version of
Penon's data, make a table with days on the y-axis, and fill in 3 columns
with those numbers, adding a slight variation to the fluid temperature.

Penon listed the flow rate as 36,000 kg/day and then arbitrarily subtracted
10% from that, as Rossi told Lewan. I do not know what justification he had
for doing that.

The water reservoir temperature is shown once at 60°C. That is also the
number Rossi quoted. Exhibit 5 has a more precise number: 68.7°C.


No one can have any respect for your anger laden statements as being
> anything other than rants.
>

The court documents show that my statements are based on facts. Or at
least, facts claimed by I.H. I think Rossi's statements have been rants.
They include no technical details or numbers.

- Jed

Reply via email to