Russ George <[email protected]> wrote: I have no interest in participating in a ‘Kangaroo Court’ process with real > court evidence, that is the proper purview of a real judge and the formal > legal process. >
By saying that, you are participating. You are using Donald Trump's favorite rhetorical technique, praeteritio. See: http://www.slate.com/articles/video/video/2015/12/donald_trump_s_preferred_rhetorical_tactic_is_called_praeteritio_is_also.html "Praeteritio is the act of saying something by saying that you’re not going to say it." > However if the secret information you have been referring to is something > different that is another case, of course the revealed source(s) of your > secret information will speak to the veracity, intent, and completeness of > said secrets and any story they may suggest. > It is no longer secret. Rossi and I.H. have revealed it. Rossi in his interview with Lewan, and I.H. in Exhibit 5. You can now judge for yourself whether I was justified or not. If you think it is likely the flow rate was 36,000 kg per day exactly, the pressure 0.0 bar, and the temperature just over 100 deg C, and this really does indicate steam production of 1 MW (not hot water), then you agree with Rossi, and you disagree with me. That's all there is to it. > No one this side of kindergarten takes a selected subset of secrets from > secret sources to represent anything other than bullshit. > I have not done that. I did not use a subset. On the contrary, Exhibit 5 says more than I knew. It is a superset. I made no assertions not made by I.H. in Exhibit 5. - Jed
