Jed, you post Mats Levan's statement as proof for your conclusion that the flow rate was exactly 36,000 kg/day. I just read his article and it clearly says that this is the average rate of flow for the test period. How do you draw the conclusion from his article that the rate is exactly the same each and every day? I am not doubting what you say, but I read it differently. Can you elaborate?
I also read that the flow meter was placed within the lowest point of the system. Is this consistent with the conclusion that the water did not fill the gauge? A closed system would seem to suggest that any device such as the referred to gauge located at the lowest point would be full of water provided that water was not vaporized. Perhaps someone can suggest a scenario that would allow the water to occupy only a portion of the gauge for a system of this type. I assume that the gauge water is at the coolest temperature and not vaporized to a significant degree. I think it is necessary for all of us to ensure that the facts that we are stating make scientific sense. It is not clear to me that this criteria is being met. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Mon, Aug 8, 2016 4:05 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Problems with Rossi's flow meter described in court document Russ George <russ.geo...@gmail.com> wrote: Just show your source and the documented evidence/data, you ask for no less of Rossi et al. I was asked not to reveal this up until now. You can now learn nearly everything I know by reading the documents uploaded by I.H. in the trial (especially Exhibit 5), and Rossi's interview with Lewan. See: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6qvuFUMAp9HMEQyeHZlX256U1E/view https://animpossibleinvention.com/2016/05/16/rossi-makes-offer-on-swedish-factory-building-plus-more-updates/ For convenience, let me again summarize what the sample data I have seen shows: Flow 36,000 kg/day exactly. Pressure 0.0 bar exactly. Fluid temperature 102.8°C (varying by a few degrees). That's all there is to it. If you would like to make your own version of Penon's data, make a table with days on the y-axis, and fill in 3 columns with those numbers, adding a slight variation to the fluid temperature. Penon listed the flow rate as 36,000 kg/day and then arbitrarily subtracted 10% from that, as Rossi told Lewan. I do not know what justification he had for doing that. The water reservoir temperature is shown once at 60°C. That is also the number Rossi quoted. Exhibit 5 has a more precise number: 68.7°C. No one can have any respect for your anger laden statements as being anything other than rants. The court documents show that my statements are based on facts. Or at least, facts claimed by I.H. I think Rossi's statements have been rants. They include no technical details or numbers. - Jed
