Jed,
I was not suggesting the steam was vented directly to the outside. What
I said was that it would not matter if it were.
To repeat:
AA. "Touching faith in a company that lied about Vaughn."
Jed. "You made that up, and now you believe it."
https://twitter.com/The_New_Fire/status/763002369219100672/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
See the bottom highlighted in red and then repeat that I am making it up.
You owe me an apology. Also you should quit the ad hominem attacks.
On 8/9/2016 10:44 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Really all that has to be proved is the water volume in and if the
output is at 102.8C at atmospheric pressure . . .
NOT possible. There were pumps pushing the water. It was not at 1 atm.
Also the electric power into the plant for the COP. It doesn't
matter what happens after the steam leaves the plant. It could
have been vented directly to the outside air.
It would have been detected by the IR cameras and other means. It was
not. There was NO HEAT anywhere. Not in the fake customer site or
anywhere else. Not 1 MW. Not 100 kW. Nothing.
You cannot make heat magically vanish away.
- Jed