Don't confuse the issue with the facts ;-) They lied about Vaughn, lied
about the error in the flow meter just below the minimum shown on the
name plate, used an electronics guy as a piping expert who thinks the
output steam pipe is DN40 and apparently is thought to be expert on
stains. If Rossi is a fraud why he not seeking money from others than
his contractual partner, unlike CherokeeIH who took $50 million on the
strength of the E-Cat? I couldn't invest in Leonardo even if I wanted
to. Before Jed claims the 1 MW plant had nothing to do with it, recall
that Woodford said they had experts crawling over it for days and were
super cautious because of the E-Cat & LENR criticisms..
On 8/9/2016 8:37 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
FYI...The company is a chinese company based in England. The validity
of the company has be verified by the U.S. government.
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
a.ashfield <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Everything else besides the ERV's report are technicalities
that are unlikely to effect the jury's decision.
Are you serious?!? I.H. will present iron-clad proof that Rossi is
a fraud, with a fake company, no excess heat, and no machine in
the fake company. Do you really believe the jury will ignore that?
Those are not "technicalities."
I.H. has one of the best law firms in the country. I am sure they
know more about juries and trials than you do.
IH has to prove Penon's report was wrong by an order of
magnitude.
Anyone could do that, easily. All you have to do is show that the
pretend customer site had no equipment and emitted not heat. You
don't even need to get into the details of calorimetry.
- Jed
