Touching faith in a company that lied about Vaughn. So far I have not
seen any solid proof of IH's claims.
The contract says the ERV's report is key. They have to show that it is
wrong by an order of magnitude.
It seems they (and you) find it easier make ad hominems attacks on Rossi
than come up with actual proof.
On 8/9/2016 8:25 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Everything else besides the ERV's report are technicalities that
are unlikely to effect the jury's decision.
Are you serious?!? I.H. will present iron-clad proof that Rossi is a
fraud, with a fake company, no excess heat, and no machine in the fake
company. Do you really believe the jury will ignore that? Those are
not "technicalities."
I.H. has one of the best law firms in the country. I am sure they know
more about juries and trials than you do.
IH has to prove Penon's report was wrong by an order of magnitude.
Anyone could do that, easily. All you have to do is show that the
pretend customer site had no equipment and emitted not heat. You don't
even need to get into the details of calorimetry.
- Jed
