Jed,
Your answer is too pathetic for words.
Placed so it was half full??? Show a diagram of the piping so an
engineer can judge it.
I note you still won't admit you were wrong on something else even after
I posted proof .
On 8/10/2016 3:53 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Peter Gluck <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
And what exactly is the truth, where was the flowmeter placed?
It was placed such that it was half full. That is what the rust marks
shows, and what careful testing shows. Obviously it cannot be lower
than the destination (the reservoir).
Can you tell or is it under NDA?
I just told you. I.H. told you. You don't believe us. You believe
Rossi instead. He gave you no more proof than I did, but you believe
him, unconditionally. So I see no reason to give you any more
information. You will reject it and demand more, and more, and more.
I expect I.H. will publish more in response to the lawsuit. You can
wait until then. But, since you do not believe what they already
published, there is no point to waiting. You have already made up your
mind that Rossi is always right, no matter what he says, not matter
how impossible it is.
- Jed
