On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:53 PM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote:
I don't think they have a good legal case. Their arguments, as I posted > severak, do not hold well at all at to (at least my) scrutiny. So, they are > like hanging to the tip of their fingers to fall to an abyss. > They have a very good legal case. Unless a further document comes to light to clarify that there was a renegotiation of the Guaranteed Performance Test to take place in Florida with a new deadline, and involving the 1 MW E-Cat and not the Six Cylinder Unit, the conclusion seems inevitable: whatever Rossi was doing was not the Guaranteed Performance Test. :) Then there was that disappointing detail about J.A. Bass. If it is shown that J.A. Bass was a fictitious identity, and that this was relevant to the story, one supposes the unclean hands doctrine will apply: "a legal doctrine which is a defense to a complaint, which states that a party who is asking for a judgment cannot have the help of the court if he/she has done anything unethical in relation to the subject of the lawsuit." [1] In order to make the case you want to make, you'll need to address each and every point in the Answer. :) Eric [1] http://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=2182
