*Daniel:Yes, let's wait for the judgment. Though I think JM was a company only made to test the product, since IH would not offer one to Rossi test. So, I don't think they are working anymore.*
Daniel, or you not familiar with the entire story or you are very selective with your memory. When they tested the plant in North Carolina under IH supervision the plant didn't work !!!! How in the right mind IH could offer to find a customer if the plant didn't work? Finally Rossi found a customer. He said he did a miracle in finding one (I bet). Rossi insisted to send the plant to Florida where they could sell the heat to a real customer. IH never agreed that will substitute for the Performance Test but they let him go with the hope to see the plant finally working (not sure what was their full set of motivations because I would have insisted for the Plant to stay in North Carolina until it worked). But I speculate they were frustrated and wanting to see some other form of evidence (without giving up on a real Performance Test eventually) and let Rossi go to Florida. But Rossi decision to go to Florida was based on only one reason: he knew he could be more free to do his magic tricks. And also he thought he could use the fake customer as corroborating evidence the device was working. He imagined IH was a much simpler fool and didn't anticipate their doubts and investigation in the matter eventually. Consider Rossi has fooled a lot of people in the past and besides some relatively short jail time he made a good living out of it. That is what is good at. A professional scammer. So again do not say that IH refused to find a customer, there was no heat to sell to anybody as far as IH was concerned. Yes, it is a little flaky, I concede, to leave to Rossi to make the call that he could sell to JM an unproven service but after all I imagine they thought if Rossi doesn't produce heat JM would not have to pay, so it is ok. They could never imagine that JM was part of this scheme. On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Giovanni Santostasi <[email protected] > wrote: > Daniel, > It doesn't work in that way. You are coming up with conspiracy theory, > after conspiracy theory. Again Occam Razor. One theory explains everything > about Rossi, your way to explain away IH evidence is to say they are > fabricating business cards, they are not giving away all the emails > involved (how that explains Fabiani didn't pick up his check I don't know). > > It doesn't work in that way if there are exculpatory pieces of evidence as > a real JM Products director of engineering it should be easy to summon him > as witness by Rossi, if Fabiani sent the data and got paid for it (or not > paid) it should be easy to prove. > > IH accusation are so precise both in context and timing that it should > easy to show they are full of shit. > Rossi has not done that and I bet everything, publicly here, that he will > not be able to do that. > > I just hope the case doesn't settle because unfortunately this how many > legal cases are resolved, people cut their losses and let go even when the > evidence is overwhelming from one side vs the other. > It simply too expensive to fight years long legal battle in particular > with weasels (should I say convicted fraudster) like Rossi. > Giovanni > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> This is what the lawyers are being paid off. To make filthy rich people >> look like Little Red Riding Hood and Rossi, the Wolf. >> >> Regarding the emails, are you sure it's all in there? Were the servers >> containing the emails apprehended? >> >> 2016-08-17 10:17 GMT-03:00 Giovanni Santostasi <[email protected]>: >> IH was too naive and they didnt do enough due diligence >> It easy to see how each lie supports the other, how everything seems to >> fit together when you have one single explanatory theory >> >> >
