Daniel, It doesn't work in that way. You are coming up with conspiracy theory, after conspiracy theory. Again Occam Razor. One theory explains everything about Rossi, your way to explain away IH evidence is to say they are fabricating business cards, they are not giving away all the emails involved (how that explains Fabiani didn't pick up his check I don't know).
It doesn't work in that way if there are exculpatory pieces of evidence as a real JM Products director of engineering it should be easy to summon him as witness by Rossi, if Fabiani sent the data and got paid for it (or not paid) it should be easy to prove. IH accusation are so precise both in context and timing that it should easy to show they are full of shit. Rossi has not done that and I bet everything, publicly here, that he will not be able to do that. I just hope the case doesn't settle because unfortunately this how many legal cases are resolved, people cut their losses and let go even when the evidence is overwhelming from one side vs the other. It simply too expensive to fight years long legal battle in particular with weasels (should I say convicted fraudster) like Rossi. Giovanni On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote: > This is what the lawyers are being paid off. To make filthy rich people > look like Little Red Riding Hood and Rossi, the Wolf. > > Regarding the emails, are you sure it's all in there? Were the servers > containing the emails apprehended? > > 2016-08-17 10:17 GMT-03:00 Giovanni Santostasi <[email protected]>: > IH was too naive and they didnt do enough due diligence > It easy to see how each lie supports the other, how everything seems to > fit together when you have one single explanatory theory > >
