As we mentioned before the only IH fault that can be deduced from the legal papers from both sides (a some common sense) is that IH was too naive and they didnt do enough due diligence (maybe enough for normal type of business but not enough for what was required in dealing with Rossi). While Rossi conduct is fraudulent in a very obvious way, in fact, almost comical way.
Did you go through the lawsuit? Did you take a look at all the evidence? As I said each element by itself would cast so much doubt but when taken together the inevitable conclusion is clear as daylight. Can you answer why Fabiani promised several times to send raw data to IH but he never followed up. He asked to be paid at a point and IH answered that there were gladly give him a check in person and meet at his preferred location if he would bring the data with him. Fabiani didn't answer. Few weeks later they sent a similar email saying a check was sitting in their office for Fabiani to be picked up in return for the data. No answer from Fabiani. Fabiani never gave the promised and agreed data. It is all documented in exhibit 21: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B5ZV0oKQafY4bHhOZHlBZFZ4MG8 Again, it is not just one single strange behavior, it is he entire sequence, chain, web if you like of lies that is so evident. It easy to see how each lie supports the other, how everything seems to fit together when you have one single explanatory theory, i. .e. Rossi is a fake and he had a cast that was supporting his leading role of chief fraudster. On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 12:41 AM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, because there are many politicians that are just like this. > > 2016-08-17 1:39 GMT-03:00 Eric Walker <[email protected]>: > >> Do you disagree? >> >> >>
