There is a video recording too.
Jed and you are wrong about the flowmeter not reading below the rated
minimum. As has been pointed out before, it is indeed quite linear
below that with a max error of 3% at very low flows, far below what was
used.
It has also been pointed out from photos that the drain leaves the
horizontal pipe ~ half full. Given time and evaporation that might
cause a stain.
Do try to come up with some new fairy tales to support your firm
convictions, although I realize it is not as exciting as speculating on
the origin of a plant photo on JM's business card.
On 8/19/2016 1:22 PM, Giovanni Santostasi wrote:
How a single photograph taken at a particular point in time proves
anything in terms of daily data?
Also Jed point was that the flowmeter could not read any flow that was
smaller than 36 kg/day as stated in the manual.
Giovanni
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:44 PM, a.ashfield <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Engineer48 gives flow rates from the digital controlled pumps on
ECat World here:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/08/19/analyzing-e-cat-plant-pumps-indicate-cop1-engineer48/
<http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/08/19/analyzing-e-cat-plant-pumps-indicate-cop1-engineer48/>
He goes on to comment that some data from the ERV's report is
given by IH in Item 5
*
"WE HAVE ERV DATA*
IH exhibit item 5 states:
According to the data you have reported (averaged data for 10
months or for 3 ERV reports),
1) the conserved mass flow rate of the system from February to
November 2015 was on
average *33,558 kg/day (1,398 kg/h)*.
2) the temperature of the water and steam were on average *68.7º C
and 102.8º C*, respectively.
3) the steam pressure was reported (for the entire period) to be
*0 kPaG*
*Surprise, Surprise Jed's claimed 36,000kg/day is not correct. I
mean does that really surprise anybody?"
*
As for the 0.0 barG steam pressure, the superheater steam can be
drawn through the piping and into the heat exchanger by a slightly
lower pressure, maybe -0.2 barG on the outlet of the primary side
of the heat exchanger.
So what we have here are 10 months of the ERV's averaged input
water temp, flow rate, output superheated steam temperature and
pressure that seems to be more realistic than Jed's flow statement
"It was 36,000kg/day every day and it never varied".
Well Jed that statement is now *"BUSTED"*.
(He shows a picture of the actual report below that can't be
reproduced here.)
As I've commented several times already, it is better to wait for
that actual facts before jumping to conclusions on second hand
reports.
