a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote: Do you have short term memory problems? I pointed out the meters were all > under 24 hr surveillance. >
Says who? I doubt it. In any case, the flow meter was wrong. Whether it was under surveillance or not, it was wrong. I doubt the pressure gauges showed 0.0, but if they did, they were wrong too. > Read what the manufacturer actually says, not what Jed writes. It is good > for the actual flow rate. > No, the flow rate was below the minimum according to the manufacturer's face plate, and the pipe was only half full. The manufacturer's manual says a half-full pipe will give the wrong answer. It warns against it. Peter Gluck says that condition cannot occur, but this manual and other flow meter manuals I have seen warn against it, so I suppose it can occur. Why would they warn against a condition that cannot happen? - Jed
