Jed, you also do not understand the function of the reservoir. peter On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 5:27 PM, a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes it would be ludicrous to place the flow meter on the return line from > the third party's equipment rather than measuring the flow directly going > into the reactors. > AA > > > > On 9/2/2016 10:18 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > > a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> The flow meter would be on the output pipe from the reservoir (near the >> bottom of it), either before or after the pump feeding the reactors. >> It is ludicrous to suggest it would be on the condensate return pipe from >> the customer. >> > > Actually, there would be nothing ludicrous about this at all if the > flowmeter were placed at the bottom of a U. This would work fine. It would > be just as good as placing the thing next to the pumps, or between the > reservoir and pumps. The flowmeter only works with liquid water, not steam, > so it has to be placed at one of these three locations. It will measure the > entire volume of water at any of the three, so they would be equally okay. > > To measure enthalpy, you also have to also measure the steam quality, with > some other instrument. I do not think Rossi did that. > > - Jed > > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
