Axil,
I don't think it follows that IH is free to do what they want with
Rossi's IP. If that were the case why would they have agreed to give
Rossi $89 million? Surely his technology, if it works, is worth more
than $11 million.
I also thought Brian Ahern had expressed his opinion that Rossi never
had anything and was just a fraud. Correct me if I'm wrong. If so, why
would Brian want to work on it?
As for facts - I have stated many times that they are not all known and
we should wait for full information. It does not seem to be a popular view.
AA
On 2/18/2017 4:20 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
There are dozens of well motivated open source replicators of Ross's
tech working now including brian Ahern and an additional hundreds that
will enter the field as soon as Rossi's tech is made available. I am
disgusted with all the innuendo that is involved in the Rossi tech
issue. It will be refreshing to deal with FACTS that can be verified
or disproved by research. IH paid for that IP and it is theirs to do
with it as they see fit. The licence agreement no longer is binding.
LET US HAVE THE FACTS AND NOTHING BUT THE FACTS.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 3:44 PM, a.ashfield <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Axil,
Apart from some of that information being proprietary it doesn't
help to have this run by avowed enemies. Remember how MIT and
CalTec bodged the replication of Pons & Fleischmann?
AA
On 2/18/2017 2:53 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
IH would be well served to release all the Rossi provided INFO
involving the Rossi reaction to the open source community and
Brian Ahern as its most prominent member**to allow that community
to run tests to see if Rossi's technology is a fraud. This
verification would support IH in their claims about Rossi.
Sunshine is the best disinfectant.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Brian Ahern <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I was watching a program about O.J. Simpson and how he had a
loyal following. I see parallels to Rossi's loyal following.
"Feed a cold and starve a fever;
argue with no true believer."
It is a waste of effort to expect the citizens of Planet
Rossi to abandon their hero. He is too charismatic and has
hypnotized a group by appealing to their hopes and dreams of
clean energy.
It is futile to expect logic and evidence will be able to
de-program the earnest followers.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* a.ashfield <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
*Sent:* Friday, February 17, 2017 8:11 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:How to overestimate water flux by wrongly
positioning an instrument
That is certainly one way of avoiding answering the questions
I asked.
You say you have "all the data." It seems very unlikely that
IH has all Rossi's data and so how would you get it?
AA
On 2/17/2017 6:18 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I have every reason to doubt it. Saying that you have
the piping drawing but refuse to publish it doesn't hold
water.
Okay, so you are saying I am a liar. Got it. I will block
any further messages from you.
Done and done.
- Jed
