IH should want to prove that Rossi's IP is a fraud and that they want to recover that $11 million in a case that features as evidence and expert testimony many hundreds of failed replications as they have themselves failed.
Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence. John Adams On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 6:00 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Brian Ahern would want to verify that Rossi's IP is a fraud as a >> statement of verified fact. >> > > Perhaps he would, but his experiment has NOTHING TO DO WITH ROSSI. You > wrote that he is replicating. That is false. If anything, it is the other > way around. Rossi was trying to replicate the Mills experiments that Ahern > is now working on. > > > >> IH et al wound want to verify their assertion that Rossi's IP does not >> work. >> > > They did not "want" to that. That is what they accomplished. They paid a > lot of money and did a lot of hard work to discover it did not work. They > were not happy with that result. > > I have done many experiments that failed. I did not "want" that to happen, > but it happened. > > > >> If IH is telling truth that IP is nothing, then they lose nothing >> related to that IP and advance their case against Rossi. >> > > They lost $11 million for crying out loud! That's not "nothing"!!! The IP > they paid for is worthless. It is a terrible loss. > > - Jed > >
