Just why this insistence on holding on to quark couples or karasses go on is puzzling, when a simple bag model for quarks offers the simpler solution. No need for melting quarks if their natural ecological state is melted. It’s just about how they decide to emerge into our world where and when the energy and matter balance make things interesting for us.
From: Bob Higgins [mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 5:37 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:UDH, wimps, and dark matter But why would such large particles be weakly interacting? On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 8:14 AM, JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net <mailto:jone...@pacbell.net> > wrote: Recently there have been a flurry of News articles about the lack of success in finding DM - but the favored candidate is still the WIMP AFAIK there is no satisfactory definition for WIMPS {after all they are dark and hard to observe} other than 1. Weakly interacting to an extreme but massive 2. Mass-energy of between 50 and 100 GeV fits into current theory 3. Suspiciously close to the Higgs in mass and other features https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particles Since they are weakly interacting to a spectacular degree, they could and probably do exist primarily in another dimension or as part of the Higgs field. One possible decay channel would be for the Higgs boson to decay to two WIMPs, each having a rest mass energy of half of the 126 GeV Higgs or about 63 GeV for the WIMP. A putative buckyball of UDH would have about the same mass equal to 60 atoms of UDH as in the carbon model. This is the candidate for WIMPS not yet considered – and in effect it is UDH in the form of a bound H60 buckyball – perhaps hidden in the Higgs field which itself is another dimension.
