It sounds like your explanation in more mythe about quasi particles and 
instantons.   Changing colors and flavors is another way of saying a coherent 
system coupled by electric, magnetic and gravitational  fields can change 
potential energy to spin energy and other forms of kinetic energy, with 
conservation of angular momentum and total energy—kinetic plus potential.

Bob Cook

From: Axil Axil <>
Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 11:53:57 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:UDH, wimps, and dark matter

Quarks that are in a strong magnetic field will generate instantons. These 
instantons are quasiparticles formed from magnetism that adds mass to the 
quark. The mass added by magnetism can be great enough to change the flavor of 
the quark(s) thus disrupting the hadron that confine the quark(s). This is what 
happens in Holmlid's experiment where a proton or a neutron is converted to a 
kaon by magnetism via instanton generation. The up and down quark in changed to 
a strange quark through the addition of new mass carried by the magnetically 
induced instantons.

The metallic hydrogen produced by Holmlid is a powerful generator of magnetism.

Related to the above, I have uncovered a new dot in the LENR puzzle to connect, 
it is called the Nelson-Barr mechanism. I will try to understand it and will 
post on it when I figure it out some. If anyone already understand this 
mechanism, please post on it.

To become familiar with the Quark jargon, here is a video that uses a lot of it.

What the presenter is after is to show why the hadron is stable under the 
action of instantons, But he shows a condition of "danger" where quarks change 
their flavor. This danger condition is what LENR is all about. This video is 
where I first ran across the Nelson-Barr mechanism.

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Russ George 
<<>> wrote:
Just why this insistence on holding on to quark couples or karasses go on is 
puzzling, when a simple bag model for quarks offers the simpler solution. No 
need for melting quarks if their natural ecological state is melted. It’s just 
about how they decide to emerge into our world where and when the energy and 
matter balance make things interesting for us.

From: Bob Higgins 
Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 5:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:UDH, wimps, and dark matter

But why would such large particles be weakly interacting?

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 8:14 AM, JonesBeene 
<<>> wrote:
Recently there have been a flurry of News articles about the lack of success in 
finding DM - but the favored candidate is still the WIMP

AFAIK there is no satisfactory definition for WIMPS {after all they are dark 
and hard to observe} other than

  1.  Weakly interacting to an extreme but massive
  2.  Mass-energy of between 50 and 100 GeV fits into current theory
  3.  Suspiciously close to the Higgs in mass and other features

Since they are weakly interacting to a spectacular degree, they could and 
probably do exist primarily in another dimension or as part of the Higgs field. 
One possible decay channel would be for the Higgs boson to decay to two WIMPs, 
each having a rest mass energy of half of the 126 GeV Higgs or about 63 GeV for 
the WIMP. A putative buckyball of UDH would have about the same mass equal to 
60 atoms of UDH as in the carbon model.

This is the candidate for WIMPS not yet considered – and in effect it is UDH in 
the form of a bound H60 buckyball – perhaps hidden in the Higgs field which 
itself is another dimension.

Reply via email to