Magnetic energy...spin can add mass to left handed quarks. This subject is a big and a complicated area in particle physics. It is not a mythe,
I am now reading this http://susy10.uni-bonn.de/data/KimJEpreSUSY.pdf On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 9:51 PM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > It sounds like your explanation in more mythe about quasi particles and > instantons. Changing colors and flavors is another way of saying a > coherent system coupled by electric, magnetic and gravitational fields can > change potential energy to spin energy and other forms of kinetic energy, > with conservation of angular momentum and total energy—kinetic plus > potential. > > > > Bob Cook > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Axil Axil <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Thursday, November 9, 2017 11:53:57 AM > *To:* vortex-l > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:UDH, wimps, and dark matter > > Quarks that are in a strong magnetic field will generate instantons. These > instantons are quasiparticles formed from magnetism that adds mass to the > quark. The mass added by magnetism can be great enough to change the flavor > of the quark(s) thus disrupting the hadron that confine the quark(s). This > is what happens in Holmlid's experiment where a proton or a neutron is > converted to a kaon by magnetism via instanton generation. The up and down > quark in changed to a strange quark through the addition of new mass > carried by the magnetically induced instantons. > > The metallic hydrogen produced by Holmlid is a powerful generator of > magnetism. > > Related to the above, I have uncovered a new dot in the LENR puzzle to > connect, it is called the Nelson-Barr mechanism. I will try to > understand it and will post on it when I figure it out some. If anyone > already understand this mechanism, please post on it. > > To become familiar with the Quark jargon, here is a video that uses a lot > of it. > > http://pirsa.org/displayFlash.php?id=16100033 > > What the presenter is after is to show why the hadron is stable under the > action of instantons, But he shows a condition of "danger" where > quarks change their flavor. This danger condition is what LENR is all > about. This video is where I first ran across the Nelson-Barr mechanism. > > > > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Russ George <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Just why this insistence on holding on to quark couples or karasses go on >> is puzzling, when a simple bag model for quarks offers the simpler >> solution. No need for melting quarks if their natural ecological state is >> melted. It’s just about how they decide to emerge into our world where and >> when the energy and matter balance make things interesting for us. >> >> >> >> *From:* Bob Higgins [mailto:[email protected]] >> *Sent:* Thursday, November 9, 2017 5:37 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:UDH, wimps, and dark matter >> >> >> >> But why would such large particles be weakly interacting? >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 8:14 AM, JonesBeene <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Recently there have been a flurry of News articles about the lack of >> success in finding DM - but the favored candidate is still the WIMP >> >> >> >> AFAIK there is no satisfactory definition for WIMPS {after all they are >> dark and hard to observe} other than >> >> >> >> 1. Weakly interacting to an extreme but massive >> 2. Mass-energy of between 50 and 100 GeV fits into current theory >> 3. Suspiciously close to the Higgs in mass and other features >> >> >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particles >> >> >> >> Since they are weakly interacting to a spectacular degree, they could and >> probably do exist primarily in another dimension or as part of the Higgs >> field. One possible decay channel would be for the Higgs boson to decay to >> two WIMPs, each having a rest mass energy of half of the 126 GeV Higgs or >> about 63 GeV for the WIMP. A putative buckyball of UDH would have about the >> same mass equal to 60 atoms of UDH as in the carbon model. >> >> >> >> This is the candidate for WIMPS not yet considered – and in effect it is >> UDH in the form of a bound H60 buckyball – perhaps hidden in the Higgs >> field which itself is another dimension. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
