> I think the reporter is utterly confused. I saw nothing in the article that
> wasn't related to hot fusion, other than the words "cold fusion".
Ah, ha! There were 4 other words. It says "'cold fusion,' or a
low-temperature nuclear reaction." That's LENR, another name for
you-know-what. It seems unlikely to me the reporter came up with that on
his own. Someone probably told him "we call this a low-temperature nuclear
reaction." And *that* can only mean cold fusion.
The mystery deepens.