JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: Sorry but that uncorroborated exchange in no way supports the possibility > of “positive thermal feedback” which can lead to increased COP. >
I do not know what "uncorroborated exchange" means. (I mean I do not understand the English.) Anyway, the fact that a positive thermal feedback exists in cold fusion has been demonstrated repeatedly -- hundreds of times -- by Fleischmann and Pons, Miles, McKubre, Storms and others. It is one of the few things we know for sure about cold fusion, along with the fact that helium is produced in a fixed ratio to Pd-D. > It could be a relic of measurement but at best is unpredictable and cannot > be controlled. > (I think you mean "artifact" rather than "relic.") Nope. It cannot be an artifact of the system because it has been measured with many different types of calorimeters. It is quite predictable. Whenever there is anomalous heat in the first place, a heat pulse will increase it. It was controlled in hundreds of boil-off experiments. Done 16 at a time, many times. > In short the original statement “there is NO positive thermal feedback > mechanism in LENR which can increase COP” stands… > No, widely replicated experimental evidence shows that is not the case. - Jed
