..right, just spammed it to Tajmar. Who could possibly be more qualified or interested? Plus he's a Kraut, so there's a good chance he's already aware of the Bessler case..
Was really hoping to give UK academia first dibs, but they're apparently far too sensible.. On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 4:05 PM, Vibrator ! <mrvibrat...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've only started this thread in the attempt to get independent data. > > It's been just over a week since achieving certainty. None of the uni's > are responding to my crank emails, for some strange reason. > > Perhaps you could help refine my template? > > "Dear proper physics-talking dudes, please find enclosed evidence of my > free-energy warp-drive doomsday machine, what i've made by waving two > masses around, type stuff. Note all the weird squiggly lines in the plots, > and the nice pastel colour-scheme. Do i win £5?" > > The DoE didn't bite, UCL physics won't bite, i tried spamming it to Imp. > College physics last night, no reply yet and not really expecting one... > > So i've tried asking here, and the best suggestions so far are "measure > its efficiency as a function of CoP" (for heat pumps?) and making a > 3D-printable version of a device that's almost certain to destroy us if not > deployed in a sensible manner. > > I haven't come here to impress or gloat, i'm asking for advice on how to > proceed. Who to approach for independent corroboration? It's just > rock-bottom basics - force, mass and motion. Everyone think's the barrel's > long scraped dry, and all the uni's are focused on particle physics, dark > matter and laser spectroscopy etc. > > At least LENR is zeitgeist crank physics, posing new and exciting > impossibilities; classical mechanics OTOH - mechanical OU? - seriously? I > seriously think i've found an elephant in the custard of classical > physics? Ha..! Good luck with that eh.. > > Who should i show it to, who can help move things forwards in some way? > A volunteer, a nomination, any reliable person or group anywhere? > > > On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 1:25 PM, Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com> wrote: > >> Here we have all the elements of a fine scam. He is taking the Rossi play >> book, page 1. >> >> >> >> 1. no independent data >> 2. no independent experiments >> 3. claim earlier experiments were wildly positive >> 4. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* Frank Grimer <88.fr...@gmail.com> >> *Sent:* Friday, June 1, 2018 5:33 PM >> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com >> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU >> >> No, no, no. >> >> On 1 June 2018 at 21:15, Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Grimes, Damn autocorrect. >> >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 4:12 PM Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Crimes? >> >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 4:11 PM Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 1:42 PM Vibrator ! <mrvibrat...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> @Chris - Weird, reminiscent of some kind of frame-dragging effect, or >> 'remanence' of the Higgs field? Sounds pretty whack either way, but hey >> who am i to talk.. >> >> >> Frank Crimes, is that you inside the Vibrator? >> >> >> >> >> -- >> *quae est ista quae progreditur quasi aurora **consurgens * >> *pulchra ut luna electa ut sol terribilis ut acies ordinata * >> >> >> >
