If you take a look at the reference( https://mephi.ru/content/articles/index.php?ELEMENT_ID=1689&SHOWALL_1=1), figure 7, you will see that the magnetic vortex flux tubes have a cross section in the nano-meter range at the point where the tubes touch the surface of the metal. The black vortex solitons (Black EVOs) that generate those tubes contain on the order of 10^23 particles, each with a spin of 2. The magnetic field per square nano-meter that these tubes carry is very large.
My view is that those vortex tubes contain quarks extracted from the substrate that the tubes contact. This idea came to me from looking at the LION reactor where a tube was inactivated and the elements that it contained was deposited on the surface like toothpaste extruded from a tube. Those elements in that extruded matter was transmuted: those elements included zirconium. See the "cannon" in this video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhitBhess2E&t=908s My belief is that the magnetic vortex flux tube produces a magnetic tube re-connection with the flux tubes that confine the quarks in the disrupted nucleons. These quarks are absorbed by the magnetic vortex flux tube. A quark plasma is then generated inside the magnetic vortex flux tube whereby quark reconfiguration occurs when the flux tube is deactivated. On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 6:33 PM Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > In light of the new Parkomov material and the interest in "strange > radiation" it seems that there are about a dozen candidates for this > phenomenon: some of which are feasible on paper like the EVO but most are > extremely unlikely. It has come down to the rock bottom realization that > either Parkomov is a fraud like Rossi - or he actually has something of > value. He should be given a chance to prove his claims - as was Rossi who > failed to perform. > > In that category of feasibility is one hypothesis which has not been > mentioned recently - the Higgs. > > As it turns out - if one is seeing strange radiation using nickel and > hydrogen (protium) then the Higgs may move from extraordinarily unlikely to > "worth re-mentioning". The signature of the Higgs decay is now well known > and it pops up here. > > As we realize, the current measurement of the mass-energy of the Higgs is > pegged to being very close to 125 GeV. This is a huge clue for looking at > other repercussions of particular experiments. Since nickel-62 is a bit of > a true singularity in terms of physical properties, being the one single > limit of stability of all nuclei in the Periodic Table - there is further > interest. > > The possibility arises that the second-type of neutron featured here as a > possibility - since it can act as a participating catalyst for the joining > of two atoms of 62Ni can then provide the exact mass-energy of the Higgs. > well, at least the fit is within error bars. > > The operative assumption of such a prediction becomes this (for QM at the > atomic level mass) which is that mass-is-mass at quantum level such that > anything which totals 125 GeV in mass energy within a given space -- is a > Higgs... period. Otherwise there could more than one kind of mass. That is > a provocative assumption which is worthy of its own thread. Stand by. > > But it leads to a tenuous path of uniting LENR with strange radiation via > the Higgs boson... or at least the equivalent mass-energy of the Higgs. > > > Jones > > >
