More... Conformation of Ken Shoulders EVO theory.
Black EVOs are pictured. They are really spooky looking. Also magnetic vortex flux tubes are called " fluxes" Action of the EVO can continue for months on the surface of metals, Of particular note as follows: Quote "During the study of the state of the surface of the samples, a change was found in the surface topography of the samples that were not exposed to the PELP but were stored in separate packaging in close proximity to the treated samples. On the surface of untreated samples of metals (Ti, Cu, Fe, steels of different grades) there are no previously missing traces. Figure 26 shows the surface of the sample of copper, which was not directly affected by prostate cancer. After sharing with samples exposed to prostate cancer, these changes were detected. The removal of a part of the metal from untreated PRSPs of the samples by dissolving in the corresponding electrolytes revealed the presence in their body of thread-like formations similar to those found on samples that underwent PRPJ treatment." This says that the active agent can be transferred from the arc exposed metal to the unexposed metal and still see the same fission reaction occur. On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 7:09 PM Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > If you take a look at the reference( > https://mephi.ru/content/articles/index.php?ELEMENT_ID=1689&SHOWALL_1=1), > figure 7, you will see that the magnetic vortex flux tubes have a cross > section in the nano-meter range at the point where the tubes touch the > surface of the metal. The black vortex solitons (Black EVOs) that generate > those tubes contain on the order of 10^23 particles, each with a spin of 2. > The magnetic field per square nano-meter that these tubes carry is very > large. > > My view is that those vortex tubes contain quarks extracted from the > substrate that the tubes contact. This idea came to me from looking at the > LION reactor where a tube was inactivated and the elements that it > contained was deposited on the surface like toothpaste extruded from a > tube. Those elements in that extruded matter was transmuted: those elements > included zirconium. > > See the "cannon" in this video. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhitBhess2E&t=908s > > My belief is that the magnetic vortex flux tube produces a magnetic tube > re-connection with the flux tubes that confine the quarks in the disrupted > nucleons. These quarks are absorbed by the magnetic vortex flux tube. A > quark plasma is then generated inside the magnetic vortex flux tube whereby > quark reconfiguration occurs when the flux tube is deactivated. > > On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 6:33 PM Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> >> >> >> In light of the new Parkomov material and the interest in "strange >> radiation" it seems that there are about a dozen candidates for this >> phenomenon: some of which are feasible on paper like the EVO but most are >> extremely unlikely. It has come down to the rock bottom realization that >> either Parkomov is a fraud like Rossi - or he actually has something of >> value. He should be given a chance to prove his claims - as was Rossi who >> failed to perform. >> >> In that category of feasibility is one hypothesis which has not been >> mentioned recently - the Higgs. >> >> As it turns out - if one is seeing strange radiation using nickel and >> hydrogen (protium) then the Higgs may move from extraordinarily unlikely to >> "worth re-mentioning". The signature of the Higgs decay is now well known >> and it pops up here. >> >> As we realize, the current measurement of the mass-energy of the Higgs is >> pegged to being very close to 125 GeV. This is a huge clue for looking at >> other repercussions of particular experiments. Since nickel-62 is a bit of >> a true singularity in terms of physical properties, being the one single >> limit of stability of all nuclei in the Periodic Table - there is further >> interest. >> >> The possibility arises that the second-type of neutron featured here as a >> possibility - since it can act as a participating catalyst for the joining >> of two atoms of 62Ni can then provide the exact mass-energy of the Higgs. >> well, at least the fit is within error bars. >> >> The operative assumption of such a prediction becomes this (for QM at the >> atomic level mass) which is that mass-is-mass at quantum level such that >> anything which totals 125 GeV in mass energy within a given space -- is a >> Higgs... period. Otherwise there could more than one kind of mass. That is >> a provocative assumption which is worthy of its own thread. Stand by. >> >> But it leads to a tenuous path of uniting LENR with strange radiation via >> the Higgs boson... or at least the equivalent mass-energy of the Higgs. >> >> >> Jones >> >> >>
